{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Association des salles de r\u00e9unions ouvri\u00e8res","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.asro1918.org","title":"Consequences of the International Court of Justice Opinion on the Right to Strike","author_name":"Adam","width":"600","height":"400","url":"https:\/\/www.asro1918.org\/Consequences-of-the-International-Court-of-Justice-Opinion.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/www.asro1918.org\/Consequences-of-the-International-Court-of-Justice-Opinion.html'\u003EConsequences of the International Court of Justice Opinion on the Right to Strike\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EOn 21 May 2026, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) confirmed that the right to strike is protected by Convention No. 87 of the International Labour Organization (ILO). This decision fundamentally changes the legal debate : it no longer concerns the existence of the right to strike, but rather the permissible limits on its exercise. \n\nA Weakened Swiss Position \n\nBefore the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, the Swiss government and employers\u2019 organizations (\u2026)\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}